h. Also bear in mind that air-borne pollutants, such as exhaust fumes, that may not normally irritate you, may now exacerbate your hay fever symptoms due to already sensitised mucus membranes from prior inflammation.
This is the blog of Alastair Hay, homeopathical.com, the home-visiting, mobile homeopath for Surrey, Kent & London areas with clinics in Guildford, Wallington, Dorking, Bromley & your home
Friday, 30 March 2012
Surviving Hay Fever
h. Also bear in mind that air-borne pollutants, such as exhaust fumes, that may not normally irritate you, may now exacerbate your hay fever symptoms due to already sensitised mucus membranes from prior inflammation.
Tuesday, 10 May 2011
Homeopathy... it's implausible!
Denouncing homeopathy as 'implausible', is akin to denouncing a self-help CD provided by a counsellor as merely plastic and metal, and therefore useless.
Many people turn to homeopathy having tried a conventional route first. Why didn't the placebo response work then? They believed in the conventional approach prior to the alternative route.
I read an article today, claiming that homeopathy is "dangerous and wasteful" - On what grounds is homeopathy 'wasteful'?
Surely, since homeopathy is relatively cheap, it actually saves the NHS money as people rely on costly pharmaceuticals less.
Homeopathy is not dangerous. Some of the practitioners can be. Would you ban cars for driving into people or the drivers? Cars and drivers can be useful too.
Educate well, those people who want to practice homeopathy. Regulate it appropriately, and integrate it, to save the NHS money... and save our beautiful NHS!
Monday, 4 August 2008
Cure?
What is a medicine supposed to do?
Why are homoeopathic medicines also called remedies?
What is a remedy?
A remedy is a solution, to rectify or to remove something undesirable.
One of the main attractions for homoeopathy is that it has a definition of cure.
This is the goal by which all prescriptions should be based...
"The highest ideal of cure is rapid, gentle and permanent restoration of the health, or removal and anihilation of the disease in this whole extent, in the shortest, most reliable and most harmless way on easily comprehensive principles."
from: The Organon of Medicine, Sixth Edition, Samuel Hahnemann
Do you feel that conventional medicines are prescribed to do this?
Sunday, 2 March 2008
There's none so blind as those that don't want to see
I was told that was cheating. Later that day, in a twist of karmic fate, my challenger dropped a shoe box full of CDs, most of which are unlabelled duplicates of our originals (as they get scratched quite quickly and we can return to the original for new copies!) So, I wryly asked, "How are you gonna tell which CD’s which? If you gave them to a chemist to analyse they’d say they were all the same - Same amount of acrylic, same amount of silver, same mass. How you gonna find out which one’s which?" She replied "I’ll just put them in the CD player, der!"
"But that’s cheating!" I grinned. To a chemist, one CD is the same as the next. We need to hear a CD to unleash its music and evoke a response. The digital information as 1s and 0s burnt onto the silver through the acrylic are read and processed into movement of airwaves that replicate the original sounds. It vibrates the air that then vibrates our eardrum. We then convert that vibration, once again, into an electrical signal for our brain to interpret. How you interpret that CD may be wildly different to me. You may enjoy ABBA, I may not. But remember, to the chemist, all CDs are the same. When I prescribe a homoeopathic medicine, I’m interested in how you interpret it. I know that you’ll be susceptible to responding to the medicine as you’ve produced symptoms that mimic what the remedy does to a healthy person. Yet, to a chemist all homoeopathic medicines are the same.
- So, if you can’t see something, does that mean it’s not there?
Monday, 3 September 2007
Immunisation anomalies
Now, vaccination theory and our immunisation programme are alleged to be based on sound scientific evidence. However, some of the theory and execution of the programme does appear to have gaping holes in it…
- When a child is given a series of vaccination injections it is expected that the child will produce a mild fever as a sign of an appropriate response of their immune system. So, why is Calpol routinely recommended to be administered to reduce the expected response? Does it reduce the ‘favourable’ effect of the vaccination? Or worse still, does it increase the likelihood of an unfavourable outcome?
- Although this isn’t an anomaly, I find it just rude… Vaccination comes from the word vaccinia, which is Latin for cow. This stems from Edward Jenner’s use of cowpox to deal with smallpox. But don’t you think that referring to mass immunisation of people as herd immunity is taking it a little too far?
- Smallpox is quite an interesting one actually… Have you heard anyone say “… well, vaccines have eradicated smallpox”? In England, free smallpox vaccines were introduced in 1840 and made compulsory in 1853. Between 1857 and 1859 there were 14,244 deaths from smallpox. After a population rise of 7%, the death rate rose by 40.8% to 20,059 between 1863 and 1865. In 1867, evaders of the vaccine were prosecuted, so very few were unvaccinated. After a population rise of 9%, the death rate rose by 123% to 44, 840 between 1870 and 1872. So, this evidence indicates that the smallpox vaccine increased the severity and incidence of smallpox when all other illness (that at the time had no vaccine) were on the decline.
- Ever heard of scarlet fever? Ever seen any one with it? At the beginning of the 1900s, scarlet fever accounted for the most deaths amongst the childhood diseases, and yet this disease declined in the same manner as measles, whooping cough, tetanus, diphtheria and TB. Ever heard of a scarlet fever vaccine? There isn’t one. If one had been introduced, would we still be using it?
- Tetanus is virtually unheard of in developed countries. It is estimated that 40% of the UK population doesn’t have an up-to-date vaccine of tetanus. In the building industry, where one may expect the incidence of tetanus to be higher due to nature of injuries sustained at work, there is no tetanus. Isn’t it plausible that we may actually have natural immunity that prevents such an illness from taking hold?
- As a physiologist, I learned that about 80% of immune system is on the outside. Very crudely, we are a hollow tube from mouth to… the other end. Our lungs and skin are also ‘outside’ (in the sense that they directly touch the outside world). Our body keeps things out it doesn’t want and utilises the things it does want. So, when we are naturally dealing with immunological challenges, we first deal with it at this level… So why do we by pass all this part of our immune system and inject? Does an unnatural exposure produce an unnatural response? Well, vaccines don’t produce an immunity in the same way as natural exposure to a disease.
- Furthermore, just because you’re exposed to something, doesn’t mean you're going to develop symptoms from it. I’ve been exposed to people with TB and not ‘caught it’ (I’m not vaccinated against TB… My GP said it didn’t work). A particular person for whom I’ve been exposed to who had TB was also vaccinated against it! Whoa!
- So, they had TB antibodies… and got TB. It is assumed that if you have antibodies to a disease you are protected against it. Here in the UK, measles vaccine, part of the MMR vaccine, is quoted as being 90% effective. This translates as 90% of the recipients will produce ‘necessary’ antibody levels. There is no definition of immunity derived from a certain level of antibodies.
- …and finally… Since vaccines don’t produce a lifelong immunity, when will adults need their next MMR booster so they don’t get these illnesses as adults?
Friday, 25 May 2007
How sick are you?
What illnesses did you have as a baby or child?
What illnesses do you have now?
Most of the babies and children I see are brought to me for help with skin complaints such as eczema, yet I see this much rarely as a presenting complaint in adults.
How have your previous illnesses been treated?
How are your illnesses treated now?
Eczema, if it's pretty bad, is treated with medicines such as hydrocortisone. This is a steroid and produces its effects by reducing the immune system. The idea is that your skin is over-responding, so to cure it, the immune system is suppressed so that it no longer reacts excessively.
Often, when the treatment is stopped, the symptoms return. This is because the underlying reason as to why your body is producing these symptoms hasn't been addressed by suppressing them. My parents were told I'd grow out of eczema. Superficially, I did. My skin was much better by the time I was about seven. The reality isn't quite so clean cut...
Rather than my skin expressing my over-sensitive immune system, my lungs were doing it instead in the form of asthma. However, as far as the dermatologist was concerned, I was cured.
Eczema and asthma are genetically, and immunologically related. Basically, asthma is eczema of the lungs. Which is more serious? To have eczema or asthma? Unless you've had both you might find it difficult to choose. I'd sooner have eczema because it's a more superficial disorder. Actually, given the choice I'd have neither thank you very much! Thankfully, I'm free of both of them now.
So, where am I heading with this...
Much fewer adults come to me to help them deal with eczema. Eczema is much less common in adults than it is in children, largely because you've 'grown out of it'... or more likely, it's been pushed inwards by the medicines that were used to treat it.
When you have homoeopathic treatment, what was suppressed, can become healed.
Since homoeopathic treatment works with your body, promoting your body's own healing processes, it pushes what was suppressed, back out again, so you get better from inside out!
Essentially, it helps you to be stronger.
This process, where your symptoms go from inside to outside as you get better is called
Hering's Law of Cure.
Dr Constantine Hering 1800 – 1880
Born in Germany
Hering was asked by his superior (who was too busy!) to write a book on homoeopathic heresy. On reading about homoeopathy, Hering was converted!
Hering's Law of Cure states that:
Cure takes place from -
inside to out (ie from deep organs to one's nearer the surface)
in the reverse order of their appearance
and from the top to the bottom of your body.
It therefore stands to reason that:
Progressing illness takes place from -
outside to inside
and from the bottom to the top of your body (ie ascending)
These wise words of Hering provide a very useful tool in practice in ascertaining whether you are getting better or worse with your treatment...
so...
How sick are you?
The difference between "must" and "will"
How many times have you said to someone,
"We must keep in touch." ?
How many times have you said to yourself,
"I must paint that wall."
"I must start that book I've always wanted to write."
"I must change my job."
"I must start a pension fund."
"I must stop smoking."
"I must tidy up."
"I must start using my camera."
"I must change that shirt I got for Christmas for the next size up."
"I must eat less and exercise more." ?
How many times did you do what you said you must do?
Wouldn't you be more likely to achieve those goals if you substitute must for will ?
"We will keep in touch."
"I will paint that wall."
"I will start that book I've always wanted to write."
"I will change my job."
"I will start a pension fund."
"I will stop smoking."
"I will tidy up."
"I will start using my camera."
"I will change that shirt I got for Christmas for the next size up."
"I will eat less and exercise more."
By changing that one word, the energy of your intent has changed.
Your sentence has been potentised.
If you have trouble changing your 'must' into 'will', a homoeopathically prescribed medicine will help you achieve this... and then your goals.
To view more visit www.homeopathical.com
